Scanner orchestration
You wire static analysis, dependency, secret, and dynamic scanners in as defined pipeline steps.
Run your scanners as pipeline steps, then gate on results
You keep the scanners you already trust, and the platform runs them as ordered pipeline steps: static analysis, dependency and composition checks, secret scanning, and dynamic testing. Findings from every tool are normalized into one report so you compare them in a single place. The pipeline gates on that result instead of leaving a wall of separate dashboards for you to reconcile.
The problem
You run static analysis, dependency checks, secret scanning, and dynamic tests, but each tool reports to its own dashboard. You manually reconcile walls of separate results to decide whether a build is safe to ship, and there is no single gate that enforces your security bar consistently.
You wire static analysis, dependency, secret, and dynamic scanners in as defined pipeline steps.
Every scanner's output lands in one consistent report so you triage in a single view.
You set the thresholds and the pipeline blocks or passes a build against that policy as code.
The platform coordinates the scanners you own rather than replacing them with a black box.
You register the security tools you already run and map them to pipeline steps.
Each step executes on a build and its findings are merged into one report.
Your policy decides whether the result lets the build proceed or stops it.
How it stays governed
You define your security thresholds once as policy as code. When a build runs, findings from every connected scanner are evaluated against that policy before the pipeline can proceed, so a control cannot be quietly skipped by omitting a step.
Every gate outcome, including which scanner produced which findings and whether the build was blocked or allowed, writes once to a tamper-evident audit trail. You can show the evidence behind any decision without reconstructing it from separate tool logs.
Works with your stack
Security scanners connect as pipeline steps; source control and CI/CD systems trigger the orchestration.
Who it’s for
Your teams use different static analysis and dependency tools. IntegraCI normalizes every scanner's output into one report so security reviewers triage in one place instead of switching between tool UIs.
Each team currently wires its own pipeline checks, which creates gaps. You define the policy once and the platform applies it as a gate on every build, regardless of which team owns the repository.
Regulated teams need to show what was scanned, what was found, and why a build was approved. Each gate decision is recorded to a tamper-evident audit trail so the evidence is ready when an auditor asks.
No. IntegraCI orchestrates the scanners you already own and normalizes their output. Your tools keep running; the platform coordinates their execution as defined pipeline steps and gates on the combined result.
The platform accepts static analysis, dependency and composition checks, secret scanning, and dynamic testing tools as pipeline steps. You map your existing tools to those step types when you wire them in.
Policies are defined as code, so they live in version control alongside your other configuration. You set the finding thresholds and severity criteria, and the platform evaluates every build result against those rules.
The pipeline stops before the build can proceed, and the decision is written to a tamper-evident audit trail with the findings that caused the block. Your team sees the reason in the normalized report rather than hunting across separate dashboards.
Request a demo, or read the docs to see how it fits the tools you already run.