Spend by owner
Costs map to the owning service and team, so accountability is clear.
See spend by service, then act on it
Understand where cloud spend goes, tied to the service and team that own it, so cost has an accountable home. Chargeback, optimization suggestions, and a carbon view turn raw bills into decisions you can act on. This is FinOps that does more than report: it can act on cost, not just describe it.
The problem
You receive a cloud bill at the end of the month with no clear line from spend to the service or team that caused it. Without that link, budgeting is guesswork, optimization is reactive, and accountability for cost has no home.
Costs map to the owning service and team, so accountability is clear.
Attribute spend back to the teams that drive it for honest budgeting.
Get concrete ways to reduce spend rather than a bill you can only read.
See the carbon footprint alongside the cost of running your services.
Cloud cost is tied to the service and team that own it.
You receive optimization suggestions and a carbon view in context.
You take action on spend from the same place you see it.
How it stays governed
Cost attribution and chargeback rules are defined as policy as code and applied consistently across every connected cost source. The same ownership mapping governs which team is accountable for which spend, so no bill lands without a named owner.
Every cost attribution, chargeback allocation, and optimization action writes once to a tamper-evident audit trail, so budget owners and finance teams can see the evidence behind every charge, not just the totals.
When an optimization suggestion proposes a change to running infrastructure, a person reviews and approves the action before it takes effect. The platform proposes; you decide.
Works with your stack
Infrastructure connectors supply raw spend data; observability connectors add service-level context so each cost entry maps to the team that drove it.
Who it’s for
When teams share accounts, costs blur together and blame is guesswork. IntegraCI maps each spend item to the owning service and team, so chargeback is based on what each squad actually drove.
Finance needs a clear line from a cloud bill to the team responsible for it. IntegraCI surfaces per-team attributed spend that budget owners can use directly, without manual allocation spreadsheets.
Instead of reading a bill and guessing where to cut, you get optimization suggestions tied to the specific services you own. You can act on them from the same place you see the cost.
No. IntegraCI connects to the cost and cloud data sources you already use and surfaces spend in context alongside the services that own it. Your billing provider stays in place.
Coverage depends on which infrastructure and cost connectors are active in your workspace. IntegraCI connects through its connector layer rather than requiring a specific provider.
No. Optimization suggestions are surfaced for your review. Any action on infrastructure requires a person to approve it first. The platform proposes; you decide what to act on.
IntegraCI attributes spend to the service and team listed as owner in the service catalog. That attribution drives chargeback, so shared accounts do not prevent accurate team-level cost tracking.
Request a demo, or read the docs to see how it fits the tools you already run.