Skip to content
New: see your fit and get a tailored quote in minutes.Try the estimator
Menu

Why IntegraCI

Governance is the platform, not a feature you bolt on after.

IntegraCI is an AI-native internal developer platform that is secure by default across the whole SDLC. The controls live in the path every change takes, so isolation, audit, and policy are properties of how the platform runs, not a layer you add later and hope holds. AI works across the lifecycle, and every AI action waits for a human. You can run all of it on your own infrastructure.

Database-enforced

Tenant isolation, not app-layer filtering

Tamper-evident

SHA-256 hash-chained audit trail

Human-approved

Every AI action waits for a person

Self-hosted

Your boundary, up to air-gapped

The problem with bolt-on governance

The tools you already have were not built to govern.

Most platform stacks are assembled from parts that each do one job well. A portal to find things. A pipeline to ship things. Then governance gets added last, by hand, in the space between them. That is the gap a control plane is supposed to close, and where most stacks leave it open.

  • 01

    The portal shows. It does not enforce.

    A developer portal catalogs your services and links out to your tools. It is a window onto the work. The controls that decide whether a change is safe live somewhere else, if they live anywhere at all.

  • 02

    CI builds. It does not govern.

    A pipeline compiles, tests, and ships. Asking it to also carry your isolation, your audit, and your policy turns every team's YAML into the place your compliance story is held together by hand.

  • 03

    Governance arrives last, on a spreadsheet.

    Controls get tracked after the fact: a spreadsheet of frameworks, a quarterly screenshot, a scramble before the review. The proof is reconstructed, not produced, and everyone knows it.

Secure by default

The control that runs is the control that counts.

Security that depends on someone remembering is security you cannot prove. IntegraCI runs your rules as policy on every change, so a build that breaks a control is caught at the gate. The default is checked, not trusted.

  • Controls run on the path, not beside it

    Your rules run as policy on every change instead of waiting in a review thread someone can skip. The check is part of the path, so it is not optional.

  • Tier-aware by design

    Hold production to a higher bar than a sandbox. The same policy bundle applies thresholds that match the risk of each environment.

  • Your scanners, gated

    Connect your own SAST, SCA, and image scanners. IntegraCI generates the scan steps, reads their results, and gates on the policy you set.

On every change secure by default
  • policy.evaluated on the path pass
  • scan.gated your scanners pass
  • tenant.isolated rls + force pass

the controls live in the path

Governance core built in
  • isolation.rls force, fail-closed on
  • audit.hashchain sha-256 on
  • policy.bundles framework-mapped on
  • access.governed approved, ttl on

the substrate, not an add-on

Governance is the product

The differentiator is what holds when nobody is watching.

Governance is not a tab in IntegraCI. It is the foundation everything else sits on. Tenant isolation enforced in the database, an audit trail that detects its own tampering, and compliance shipped as policy you can run. This is the part you would have had to build, and the reason to start here.

  • Isolation the database enforces

    Database-enforced row-level security keeps one tenant from reading another's data. The boundary holds even when application code has a bug, because it lives below the application.

  • A trail no one can quietly edit

    Every action is written once to an audit trail secured by a SHA-256 hash chain. Change a record and the chain stops adding up, so tampering shows instead of hiding.

  • Frameworks as policy you can read

    Compliance ships as versioned policy bundles mapped to SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and more. You read them, test them, and run them. They map to the frameworks. They are not a certification.

Policy bundles, not certification

The compliance bundles are named for the frameworks they map to. They are not a certification, and IntegraCI does not claim to be certified. We describe only what ships: policy you can read, test, and run.

AI-native but governed

AI that helps everywhere and acts nowhere on its own.

AI is woven through the lifecycle, not stapled on as a chatbot. It drafts fixes, triages incidents, and proposes the next step. Then it stops and waits. Every action it takes passes the same policy gate and the same human approval a person's would, and lands in the same audit trail.

  • AI across the lifecycle

    AI proposes fixes for known CVEs, triages incidents, and drafts the change. It works where the work is, from the first ticket to the deploy, with per-tenant budget caps.

  • Every action waits for a human

    When an agent opens a pull request or requests access, it passes the same policy gate as a person and waits for an approval. There is no path around the controls for AI.

  • Recorded like any other actor

    An AI action lands in the same tamper-evident trail as a human one. You can see what it proposed, who approved it, and when, after the fact.

Agent action human-in-the-loop
  • agent.proposed cve-fix PR drafted
  • policy.checked same gate pass
  • human.approval awaiting review held

nothing ships until a human says so

Your boundary self-hosted
  • portal
  • engine
  • governed ai
  • compliance evidence
data leaves your network denied

air-gapped if you need it

You own it

A platform you run, not a tenant you rent.

When the controls are this load-bearing, where they run matters. IntegraCI is self-hostable to your own infrastructure, air-gapped if a sovereignty review demands it. You run the platform inside your own boundary, so governed AI and compliance evidence never leave the boundary you answer for.

  • Self-hostable to your own infrastructure

    Run the whole platform on your own stack. The portal, the engine, governed AI, and your compliance evidence stay inside the boundary you control.

  • Air-gapped when you need it

    For a sovereignty review that will not accept a vendor promise, run it disconnected. Nothing has to leave your network for the platform to work.

  • Runs inside your boundary

    You self-host it on your own infrastructure, all the way to air-gapped, and verify what it does through a tamper-evident audit trail, instead of trusting a vendor cloud with the controls you answer for.

Start with the platform that governs by default.

Request a demo and see the gates, the isolation, the audit trail, and governed AI working on your own pipeline. Bring your scanners and your frameworks. Run it on your own infrastructure when you are ready.