Use case · Compliance evidence
Audit prep should not mean reconstructing what happened from memory and chat logs. IntegraCI records every deploy, scan, policy check, and access grant as it happens, in a write-once trail an auditor can verify. When the review comes, you export the slice they ask for and move on. The same trail covers every tenant, from a guided evaluation to a self-hosted, air-gapped install.
Who this is for
The problem
The work is real, the controls are followed, but the proof lives in places that drift and disappear. That gap between doing the right thing and showing you did it is what makes audits painful.
The screenshot scramble
Audit season turns into a hunt for screenshots, Slack threads, and ticket links that prove a control was followed. Half of it lives in someone's head.
Evidence that drifts
A spreadsheet of controls goes stale the moment a pipeline changes. By the review, what you wrote down and what you actually do no longer match.
No way to prove it held
You can say a deploy was approved and a scan passed. Proving it, in a form an auditor can verify rather than trust, is the hard part.
The audit trail
Every action on the platform writes an entry, and every entry is chained to the one before it. The result is a trail that proves itself: change a record and the chain breaks. You give a reviewer something they can check, not just take your word for.
Write-once, never rewritten
Actions add records. Nothing edits history. The evidence is what the platform did, not a reconstruction assembled after the fact.
Tamper-evident by design
Each entry is cryptographically chained to the one before it. Alter or drop a record and the chain stops adding up, so quiet edits show.
Kept for the long haul
The trail is archived on a schedule and stays queryable across the long retention windows reviewers ask for.
each entry chained to the last
control
SOC 2 · CC8.1 change management
range
2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
the slice they asked for, nothing more
Evidence export
When a reviewer asks for proof against a control, you export the matching entries for the period they care about. It comes out as a verifiable bundle, scoped to your tenant and chained so they can confirm it was not touched after the fact.
Scoped to the request
Export the entries for a control, a service, or a date range. The auditor gets the slice they asked for, not a data dump to wade through.
Verifiable, not just readable
Because each entry is chained, an exported trail proves itself. A reviewer can confirm nothing was added or removed after the fact.
Tenant-scoped at the source
Exports never cross a tenant boundary. Database-enforced row-level security enforces the line in the database, not in app code.
Controls, mapped
The frameworks you report against don't have to live in a sheet someone forgets to update. Pre-built policy bundles map your controls to the platform activity that satisfies them, so the link between a requirement and its evidence is maintained as you work, not patched together at review.
Mapped to the frameworks you answer to
Pre-built policy bundles map to SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR. Each control points at the platform activity that satisfies it.
Checked on every run, not once a year
Controls ship as policy and run through policy gates in the pipeline. A change that breaks a control is caught when it happens.
AI actions on the same record
When the governed AI gateway opens a PR or requests access, the approval and the action land in the same trail as everything else.
These are compliance policy bundles named for the frameworks they map to (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR). They are not a certification, and IntegraCI does not claim to be certified or compliant. They give you controls mapped to those frameworks and the evidence to back them up.
The proof
The claim holds because of how it is built. Each control runs in the path, records what it did, and maps to the framework you report against.
Policy gates block non-compliant actions in the delivery path
Policy as code runs at every governed step: a deploy, a secrets rotation, an access grant. If the artifact or action does not satisfy the defined controls, the action is blocked before it reaches the target environment. The gate decision, including which policy rule fired, which artifact was evaluated, and the outcome, is written immediately to a tamper-evident audit trail that no application code can overwrite.
Database-enforced row-level security isolates and protects evidence records
Every audit record is stored under database-enforced row-level security scoped to your tenant. Application code cannot read or modify records outside its boundary, and no UPDATE or DELETE path exists for committed evidence rows. The record an auditor receives is identical to the record written at event time.
Human-in-the-loop approval creates a durable receipt for every state-changing action
Any governed action that changes state, whether an access grant, a production deploy, or a policy override, is routed to an approval inbox before execution. The platform records who proposed the action, who approved it, and when. A durable workflow receipt ties the proposal, the approval, and the execution together in a single traceable chain.
Maps to
The platform maps your controls to these frameworks. The mapping helps you demonstrate them; it is not a certification.
The artifact is the proof
Compliance evidence bundle
A structured, exportable bundle that maps every recorded gate decision, approval receipt, and control event to the specific framework controls you select, formatted to hand directly to an auditor.
Under the hood
This job is not a separate product. It is the platform seen from one angle. Here are the capabilities it runs on.
Policy as Code
Write governance rules as versioned, tested code
GovernCompliance & Audit
Tamper-evident audit trail with one-bundle evidence export
SecureAccess Governance
Just-in-time, time-bound access instead of standing keys
SecureSupply Chain Security
Prove what you shipped is what you built
GovernPosture Management
See your real DevSecOps posture from evidence, not surveys
QualityScorecards
A running read on every service across the standards that matter
No. The platform orchestrates and gates the tools you already run. Your scanners produce findings; IntegraCI enforces that those findings are resolved before a deploy proceeds and records the outcome. You keep your existing toolchain and gain a governed, auditable layer on top of it.
No. The bundle maps your recorded control events to framework controls and gives your auditor the evidence they ask for. Certification decisions belong to your auditor and accreditation body. The platform makes evidence collection continuous and complete; it does not issue or imply certification.
No. Audit records are written under database-enforced row-level security with no update or delete path available to application code. The isolation is structural, not a configuration option someone can turn off, so the record your auditor sees is the record created at the time of the event.
Continuous scorecards evaluate every service against your defined controls on every change. Drift is flagged in real time rather than discovered during the next audit cycle. You can gate deploys on scorecard thresholds so a service cannot regress below a required compliance level and remain in production.
Request a demo and watch the trail build itself as your team ships. When the review comes, the proof is already recorded and ready to export. Self-host up to air-gapped, or let us run it.