Provider-agnostic control
You manage records across providers like Cloudflare and Route 53 from one place instead of juggling separate consoles.
Provider-agnostic DNS as one governed self-service surface
Manage DNS records across providers (such as Cloudflare and Route 53) through a single self-service surface with policy applied to every change. The same surface scans for dangling records and subdomain-takeover risk so stale entries do not become an attack path. This is an emerging capability.
The problem
You manage DNS across more than one provider, but each has its own console, its own access model, and no shared policy layer. A stale record left behind after a service decommission sits unnoticed until a researcher finds it and takes over the subdomain.
You manage records across providers like Cloudflare and Route 53 from one place instead of juggling separate consoles.
Policy as code applies to record changes, so risky or out-of-bounds edits are gated before they take effect.
The surface continuously scans for dangling records and flags subdomain-takeover risk before attackers find it.
Teams make their own DNS changes through a governed surface rather than filing tickets with a central team.
You connect the DNS providers you already use, such as Cloudflare and Route 53.
You make record changes through the self-service surface where policy as code evaluates each one.
The platform scans your zones for dangling records and surfaces subdomain-takeover exposure for you to fix.
How it stays governed
Policy as code is applied to every record change before it is written. Edits that fall outside defined bounds are gated at the surface, not discovered after the fact.
Each record change and gate decision is written once to a tamper-evident audit trail. You can show exactly what changed, when, and whether policy allowed or blocked it.
Works with your stack
DNS providers such as Cloudflare and Route 53 connect as infrastructure sources; dangling-record scan results feed the security posture surface.
Who it’s for
If your team uses both Cloudflare and Route 53, you get one governed surface instead of two separate consoles with two separate access models and no shared rule set.
After a service is decommissioned, its DNS record can become a takeover target. Continuous scanning surfaces dangling records so your team finds them before an attacker does.
Platform teams can open DNS changes to developers through a governed surface. Policy as code enforces the rules, so no central-team ticket is needed for routine changes.
No. IntegraCI connects to the providers you already use, such as Cloudflare and Route 53, and applies governance across them. Your zones and records stay where they are.
Cloudflare and Route 53 are the initial providers. The surface is designed to be provider-agnostic, so additional providers can be connected as the capability matures.
This is an emerging capability. The core self-service surface, policy evaluation, and dangling-record scanning are available and actively being developed.
Policies are written as code using the same policy-as-code layer that governs other IntegraCI capabilities. A rule defined once applies to every connected provider through the same surface.
Request a demo, or read the docs to see how it fits the tools you already run.