Per-service SLOs
Define objectives for each service so reliability targets match how the service is used.
Make reliability a decision, not a surprise
Set per-service objectives and track them against an error budget you can actually spend. Burn-rate warnings tell you when you are using that budget too fast, while there is still time to act. Reliability becomes a deliberate choice you make rather than an outage you absorb.
The problem
You have reliability targets written down somewhere, but no live number tells you when you are spending them too fast. The first real signal that the budget is exhausted is often the outage itself. By then the decision to ship one more change was already made without the data, and the postmortem is the only record that anything went wrong.
Define objectives for each service so reliability targets match how the service is used.
See how much budget remains and decide whether to ship or stabilize.
Get warned when you are spending the budget too quickly, before it runs out.
Trade speed against stability with the numbers in front of you, not after the fact.
You set a target for a service and the budget that backs it.
Delivery and health signals draw down the budget as the service runs.
Burn-rate alerts reach you while there is still room to respond.
How it stays governed
SLO targets and burn-rate thresholds are defined as policy as code, so the rules that govern when a warning fires are explicit, versioned, and applied consistently across every service. A team cannot quietly raise a threshold without that change being tracked alongside the policy that set it.
Each budget draw-down, threshold breach, and warning event writes once to a tamper-evident audit trail, so you can show not just that a service met its objective over a window, but when the signal arrived, what the budget state was, and what followed.
Works with your stack
Observability tools feed the health signals that draw down the budget; CI/CD and deploy connectors surface the delivery events that affect it.
Who it’s for
A team preparing a Friday deploy checks the current error budget before merging. The budget state is visible in the platform, so the call to ship or hold is made with the numbers in front of everyone rather than on feel.
A platform team defines minimum SLO targets as policy as code and applies them across every service tier. Teams see how their service tracks against the standard without the platform team having to chase each one manually.
An on-call engineer receives a burn-rate warning at the point where roughly a third of the weekly budget has been spent in an hour. There is still time to investigate and respond before the objective is breached.
No. IntegraCI orchestrates decisions on top of the health signals your existing observability tools already produce. Your monitoring stack keeps running; IntegraCI tracks what the signals mean for your error budget and tells you when you are spending it too fast.
Your team defines them as policy as code. IntegraCI tracks budget consumption against whatever target you set, so the rules are explicit, versioned, and visible rather than held in someone's head.
Delivery and health signals from your connected observability and deployment tools. As the service runs, those signals update the remaining budget so the number you see reflects what is actually happening, not a snapshot from last week.
Yes. SLOs are defined per service, so a user-facing checkout flow can carry a tighter objective than an internal batch job. Each service tracks its own budget independently.
Request a demo, or read the docs to see how it fits the tools you already run.