Skip to content
New: see your fit and get a tailored quote in minutes.Try the estimator
Menu

Software Supply Chain Security

Prove what you shipped is what you built

Build pipelines produce artifacts. Deployments consume them. The gap between those two facts is where supply chain risk lives. IntegraCI closes that gap by orchestrating the provenance, scanning, and policy gates you already rely on into a single governed chain of custody. Every artifact that reaches production carries a verifiable record of where it came from, what scanned it, and which policy cleared it. When an auditor asks what ran in production last quarter, you pull a record, not a spreadsheet.

Who this is for

Platform Engineer
Needs a single control plane to wire signing, scanning, and promotion gates across every pipeline without maintaining bespoke scripts per team.
Security Engineer
Needs quarantine and fail-closed defaults so a flagged dependency never reaches production without a reviewed, recorded decision.
Compliance Officer
Needs an exportable, tamper-evident record that maps each release to the policy gates and attestations that cleared it.

The problem

The chain of custody exists in pieces

Most teams run scanners, sign some artifacts, and have deployment controls. But those pieces rarely connect into a governed chain where a missing link blocks the build.

  • Provenance is optional, not enforced

    Signing and attestation steps are added manually per pipeline. When a team skips them under deadline pressure, nothing blocks the build. You find out during an audit, not before a deploy.

  • Deployed artifacts drift from scanned ones

    A scanner runs on a candidate image. A different tag or a rebuilt layer reaches production. Without digest-pin enforcement at deploy time, the scan result and the running artifact are two different things.

  • Audit evidence is reconstructed, not recorded

    When a regulator asks which version of a dependency was in production on a specific date, the answer requires pulling logs from five systems and hoping they agree. The chain of custody was never written in one place.

How it works

How IntegraCI governs the supply chain

IntegraCI sits between your build tools and your deployment targets. It enforces the policies, records the decisions, and holds the gate.

  • Capture provenance at build time

    IntegraCI triggers your signing and attestation tools as pipeline steps and records the resulting provenance metadata against the artifact digest. The record is written at build time, not reconstructed later. If an attestation step fails or is skipped, the gate fails immediately.

  • Enforce digest-pin and freshness policy at deploy time

    Before a deployment is allowed, IntegraCI checks that the artifact digest matches what was attested, that the base image age falls within your freshness policy, and that no quarantine flag is active. Any mismatch blocks the promotion. Policy-as-code rules define the exact thresholds your security team controls.

  • Quarantine risky artifacts before production

    When a scanner step reports a critical finding, IntegraCI places the artifact in quarantine. Downstream workflows fail closed. A named reviewer sees the finding, the affected artifact, and the policy that triggered the flag, then records an approval or rejection. Nothing proceeds without that decision, and the decision is written to the audit trail.

  • Produce a tamper-evident trail for every release

    Every gate evaluation, policy version used, quarantine action, override, and reviewer decision is appended to an immutable audit log keyed to the artifact digest and release identifier. You can export a structured evidence bundle for any release on demand.

payments-api - supply chain gate gated
  • Commit provenance signed Digest sha256:a3f9c2... attested at build
  • Component inventory scanned 142 components, 0 critical CVEs
  • Build reproducibility check Output digest matches attested record
  • Image freshness policy Base image 54 days old (limit: 30)
  • Quarantine gate 1 transitive dependency flagged, pending reviewer disposition
  • Deploy promotion to staging Blocked: open quarantine item and freshness violation

A supply chain gate panel for a single release showing provenance, inventory scan, and policy checks in sequence. The deploy is blocked until both open items are resolved and recorded.

What you experience

What your team experiences every day

Supply chain governance becomes an automatic part of delivery, not a separate checklist before an audit.

  • Developers see gate results where they work

    Pass, block, and quarantine outcomes appear alongside the pipeline run. A developer knows immediately whether a flagged dependency is blocking promotion and what the reviewer decided, without filing a ticket or waiting for a security team reply.

  • Security teams get a live quarantine queue

    Flagged artifacts appear in a dedicated review queue with the finding, the affected artifact digest, and the policy that triggered the flag. The reviewer records an approval or rejection in the same view. The decision is written to the audit trail before any downstream workflow is unblocked.

  • Compliance teams pull evidence on demand

    For any release, you export a structured bundle covering signed provenance attestations, component inventory, gate evaluations, quarantine actions, and reviewer dispositions. No log-scraping. No narrative assembled from Slack threads.

Outcomes

What changes when the chain is closed

  • A defensible chain from commit to production

    Every artifact that runs in production carries a verifiable record. If a supply chain incident is disclosed, you can determine whether you were affected and demonstrate it to a regulator with a structured, exportable record, not a manual reconstruction.

  • Faster, lower-cost audit response

    Evidence that used to take days to assemble is ready to export in minutes. The audit log is append-only and structured, so the response to a regulator request is a file, not a project.

  • Reduced blast radius when a risk surfaces

    Quarantine and fail-closed defaults mean a flagged artifact stops at the gate, not after it has been deployed to multiple environments. The review record shows the decision was deliberate and documented, not accidental or silent.

The proof

Mechanisms you can point at, not adjectives.

The claim holds because of how it is built. Each control runs in the path, records what it did, and maps to the framework you report against.

Policy gate at build promotion

A policy-as-code rule evaluates the artifact's provenance attestation, digest match, image freshness, and quarantine status before any promotion workflow proceeds. A missing or mismatched attestation fails the gate immediately. The gate decision, the policy version that evaluated it, and the outcome are appended to the release's audit record.

Fail-closed quarantine boundary

When a scanner reports a critical finding, the platform writes a quarantine record against the artifact digest. All deployment workflows check quarantine status before proceeding and stop if the flag is active. A named reviewer records a disposition before any workflow resumes. The review is written to the append-only audit log and cannot be modified after the fact.

Tamper-evident release audit trail

Every gate evaluation, policy version, override, quarantine action, and reviewer decision is written to a database-enforced, append-only audit trail keyed to the artifact digest and release identifier. The record is structured, queryable, and exportable. It cannot be altered after it is written.

Maps to

  • SLSA
  • NIST SSDF
  • SOC 2
  • ISO 27001

The platform maps your controls to these frameworks. The mapping helps you demonstrate them; it is not a certification.

The artifact is the proof

Supply Chain Evidence Bundle

An exportable, structured record containing signed provenance attestations, component inventory results, all gate evaluations, quarantine actions, and reviewer dispositions for a given release, ready to hand to an auditor.

Questions, answered.

Does IntegraCI replace the scanners and signing tools we already run?

No. IntegraCI orchestrates the tools you run today: your container scanner, your signing workflow, your attestation toolchain. It adds the policy gate, the quarantine state, and the audit record on top of what you have. You do not need to swap out a scanner or change your signing tool.

Which provenance and signing standards does it work with?

IntegraCI is built around SLSA-aligned attestation patterns and digest-based artifact identity. It does not require a specific signing tool. If your pipeline produces a provenance attestation and identifies the artifact by digest, the gate can evaluate it against your policy rules.

Where does artifact metadata and the audit log live? Can we keep it inside our own boundary?

IntegraCI can be deployed inside your own infrastructure. Artifact metadata, provenance records, and audit logs are stored in your own database under database-enforced row-level security. Nothing is sent to an external service unless you configure an outbound connector explicitly.

Who writes the supply chain policies and how are they maintained?

Policies are written as policy-as-code rules by your platform or security team and versioned in your repository alongside your other infrastructure definitions. IntegraCI evaluates them at gate time. Any policy change that affects a live gate is recorded in the audit trail, including who applied it and when.

Close the gap between your build and your proof

IntegraCI wires your existing signing, scanning, and deployment tools into a governed chain of custody. Connect your pipeline, define your policy in code, and every release produces a verifiable, exportable record. Your next audit starts with evidence, not a search.