Tests as pipeline steps
Your existing test suites run as governed stages in the same pipeline that ships your code.
Run your tests as pipeline steps and gate on the results
Orchestrate the automated tests you already write as steps in your pipeline and gate releases on the results. Findings from different frameworks are normalized into one view, and AI-assisted test generation helps you fill coverage gaps. IntegraCI runs the test tools you use, it does not replace them.
The problem
Your teams write tests, but those tests do not always run as a real gate on the release. Results land in different framework dashboards, coverage numbers live wherever someone last updated them, and a suite that turns red does not automatically stop a build. You find out a critical path was untested when a defect reaches production.
Your existing test suites run as governed stages in the same pipeline that ships your code.
Releases stop when tests fail or coverage drops below the threshold you set.
Results from different frameworks land in a single view so you read pass, fail, and flake in one place.
An emerging capability under active development suggests new tests to close the gaps your suite misses.
Point IntegraCI at the test tools and frameworks your teams already run.
Tests execute as a pipeline step and report results back into the release decision.
You review normalized results and generated suggestions, then improve coverage where it counts.
How it stays governed
You define pass-rate and coverage thresholds once as policy as code. Every build that touches a gated stage is evaluated against those rules, so a failing suite or a coverage drop cannot be waved through by skipping a step.
Each gate decision writes once to a tamper-evident audit trail alongside the test results and the threshold that determined it. When a release is questioned, you can show exactly what ran, what the threshold was, and why the build was allowed or stopped.
AI-assisted test generation proposes new tests to fill coverage gaps. A person reviews and decides which suggestions to adopt before they are added to the suite, so generated tests are never committed without human review.
Works with your stack
Test tools and frameworks connect as steps in your existing pipeline; IntegraCI normalizes the results without replacing your runners.
Who it’s for
When your backend runs one test framework and your frontend runs another, you need one gate that covers both. IntegraCI normalizes results from each framework and holds the release until all thresholds pass.
Teams running unit, integration, and end-to-end suites get a single view of pass, fail, and flake status across the build. You stop checking multiple dashboards to understand whether a release is healthy.
The AI-assisted generation capability suggests tests for code paths your suite does not yet cover. Your team reviews the suggestions and decides which to add, so gaps are addressed before they become defects.
No. IntegraCI orchestrates the test tools and frameworks you already run as steps in your pipeline. Your test suites keep running exactly as they do today; IntegraCI gates the release on their results.
IntegraCI normalizes results from the frameworks you connect. You point it at the tools your teams already use and the results flow into the shared view. Coverage expands as new connectors are added.
You define the thresholds as policy as code. The same rules apply every time a build runs, and a build that misses a threshold is stopped and recorded rather than silently passed.
AI-assisted generation is an emerging capability under active development. It proposes tests for human review and nothing is committed automatically. It is useful today for surfacing gaps, and its coverage will grow over time.
Request a demo, or read the docs to see how it fits the tools you already run.