Derived from evidence
Your posture is built from signals the platform can actually see, not from a form your team filled out by hand.
Govern
Posture Management
See your real DevSecOps posture from evidence, not surveys
Get an evidence-derived read on your DevSecOps posture across the dimensions of your DevSecOps practice, built from what the platform can actually observe rather than a self-assessment questionnaire. Because the score is grounded in real signals, you can target improvements where the gaps truly are and watch posture move as you close them.
- A posture picture grounded in what the platform can actually observe, not in what your team reported
- Improvement priorities backed by real evidence rather than survey responses
- Posture that moves as you close gaps, so the effect of your work is visible before the next audit
The problem
You know your DevSecOps practice has gaps, but your only read on where they are comes from a questionnaire your team filled out last quarter. Survey answers reflect intent, not reality, so you cannot trust the score enough to act on it and you find out what was actually missing when an auditor asks.
Without IntegraCI
- Posture scores from surveys your team filled out by hand
- No single view across secure, operate, and govern work
- Gaps stay hidden until an auditor surfaces them
- Improvement priorities based on guesswork, not evidence
With IntegraCI
- Posture derived from signals the platform can actually observe
- One read spanning your entire DevSecOps practice
- Gaps identified by area from real data, not reported estimates
- Score that moves as you close gaps, not just at the next audit
What you get
Across your whole practice
You get one read spanning secure, operate, and govern work, so no part of your DevSecOps practice hides in a blind spot.
Grounded improvement targets
Because gaps come from real data, you can prioritize the fixes that move your posture instead of guessing.
Posture that moves with you
As you close gaps, the evidence updates, so you watch your posture improve rather than wait for the next audit cycle.
How it works
- 1
Gather the signals
The platform reads what it can observe across your pipelines, access, and controls to assemble a factual picture.
- 2
Score the posture
Those signals roll up into an evidence-derived read across your DevSecOps practice, with gaps called out by area.
- 3
Close the gaps
You act on the highest-value gaps and watch your posture update as the underlying evidence changes.
How it stays governed
The same gates everyone passes, applied here.
Gated by policy
The rules that determine what counts as a gap are defined as policy as code, so the scoring logic is versioned, reviewable, and applied consistently across every dimension of your DevSecOps practice rather than buried in a spreadsheet or in someone's head.
Recorded, tamper-evident
Every evidence signal that feeds your posture score is recorded in a tamper-evident audit trail, so you can show an auditor exactly what data backed each dimension of the score and when it was observed.
Works with your stack
Connect the tools you already run.
Signals are gathered from connected source control, pipeline, security, and observability tools to build the evidence base for your posture score.
- Atlassian
- Gerrit
- Gitea
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Microsoft
- Akuity
- Amazon Web Services
- Buildkite
- CircleCI
- CNCF Tekton
- Drone CI
- Harness
- Jenkins
- Aqua Security
- DefectDojo
- Elastic
- Google Cloud
- +28 more
Who it’s for
Where teams reach for it.
Prepare for an external audit without scrambling
When an audit is approaching, you need evidence rather than assertions. Posture Management gives you a traceable read built from real platform signals, so you walk in with data rather than a self-assessment.
Prioritize security investments across teams
When every team has a different mix of controls in place, it is hard to know where more investment actually moves the needle. The evidence-derived score shows which gaps are real and which areas to address first.
Confirm that a remediation program made a difference
After closing a set of gaps, teams need to know the work actually moved posture rather than assume it did. As the underlying evidence updates, the score reflects what changed so the improvement is visible.
Questions, answered.
Does Posture Management replace our existing security assessment tool?
No. IntegraCI reads signals from the tools you already run and does not replace your scanners or assessment processes. It builds a posture picture from what those tools produce and what the platform can observe across pipelines, access, and controls.
What signals does it actually read?
The platform reads what it can observe across connected pipelines, access controls, and security tool outputs. The specific signals depend on which connectors you have active, so the posture picture reflects your actual connected environment.
How are the scoring rules defined?
Posture dimensions and gap thresholds are defined as policy as code. That means the rules are versioned, auditable, and consistent rather than owned by one person who happens to remember how the last questionnaire was scored.
Does the score update in real time?
The score updates as the underlying evidence changes. When you close a gap and the platform observes the new signal, the posture reflects that. You do not wait for the next audit cycle to see whether your work made a difference.
Put Posture Management on your stack.
Request a demo, or read the docs to see how it fits the tools you already run.