Four dimensions, one view
Each service is scored across security, delivery, reliability, and ownership so you read its health at a glance.
Quality
Scorecards
A running read on every service across the standards that matter
Scorecards give you a continuous read on each service across security, delivery, reliability, and ownership. They set the bar the platform measures every service against, and the same signal nudges teams toward the current standard. You see where a service stands and what it takes to clear the line.
- A continuous, evidence-backed read on every service in one place
- Teams know exactly what the current standard is and which gaps to close next
- A recorded, policy-grounded baseline that does not drift between teams or reviews
The problem
You know your standards exist on paper, but no single place tells you where each service actually stands against them. Health signals are spread across separate tools, the definition of good shifts by team, and gaps stay invisible until an incident or audit forces the conversation.
Without IntegraCI
- Health signals spread across separate tools, no single read
- Standards live in wikis and people's heads
- Gaps surface during incidents or at audit time
- Each team interprets good differently
With IntegraCI
- One score per service across security, delivery, reliability, and ownership
- Explicit checks encode the current standard as policy as code
- Gaps visible in context before they become problems
- The same signal that grades a service points teams at what to fix next
What you get
A clear bar to clear
Scorecards encode the current standard as explicit checks, so every team knows what good looks like.
Nudges toward the standard
The same signal that grades a service points teams at the specific gaps to close next.
Evidence-backed grades
Scores draw on real pipeline, security, and reliability signals already flowing through the platform.
How it works
- 1
Define the bar
You set the checks that make up each dimension and the threshold a service must meet.
- 2
Score continuously
The platform evaluates every service against those checks as new signals arrive.
- 3
Drive improvement
Teams see their gaps in context and work them down toward the standard.
How it stays governed
The same gates everyone passes, applied here.
Gated by policy
Scorecard checks are defined as policy as code, so the bar every service is measured against is explicit, versioned, and applied consistently. No informal interpretation of what a passing service looks like, and no team can quietly lower the standard for itself.
Recorded, tamper-evident
Each evaluation writes the evidence behind it to a tamper-evident audit trail, so you can show exactly which checks a service passed or failed, and when. The record reflects real signals, not a checklist filled in by hand.
Works with your stack
Connect the tools you already run.
Scorecard dimensions draw on signals from the source control, pipeline, security, and observability connectors already configured in your platform.
- Atlassian
- Gerrit
- Gitea
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Microsoft
- Akuity
- Amazon Web Services
- Buildkite
- CircleCI
- CNCF Tekton
- Drone CI
- Harness
- Jenkins
- Aqua Security
- DefectDojo
- Elastic
- Google Cloud
- +28 more
Who it’s for
Where teams reach for it.
Get a continuous read across a large service fleet
Engineering leadership needs a single place to see how services across many teams measure up against the same standard. Scorecards give each service a grade across four dimensions without pulling a report by hand.
Close gaps before an audit
A team preparing for a compliance review can see exactly which checks are failing for each service and work them down in priority order. The gap list is drawn from real signals already flowing through the platform, not a spreadsheet filled in manually.
Roll out a new platform standard
When the platform team raises the bar on security or delivery practices, scorecards make the new threshold explicit and immediately show every team where they stand. The standard is in code, not a memo that gets ignored.
Questions, answered.
Does IntegraCI replace the scanners and monitoring tools we already run?
No. IntegraCI reads the signals those tools already produce. Your scanners, pipelines, and observability tooling keep running; scorecards aggregate and grade their output against the checks you define.
Who defines the checks that make up each dimension?
You do. Checks are defined as policy as code, so your platform or engineering-standards team sets the bar and can update it as practices evolve. The platform measures every service against whatever threshold you set.
Which signals actually feed the security or reliability dimension?
Scores draw on real pipeline, security, and reliability signals already flowing through the platform from the connectors you have configured. If a signal is already reaching the platform, it can feed a scorecard check.
Can different service types have different standards?
Yes. You define the checks and thresholds per scorecard, so you can set a higher bar for customer-facing services and a lighter baseline for internal tooling. Each service is measured against the scorecard that applies to it.
Put Scorecards on your stack.
Request a demo, or read the docs to see how it fits the tools you already run.