Threat models and DPIAs
Author the assessments your security and privacy reviews require.
Govern
Risk Assessments
Threat models and DPIAs, drafted by AI, signed off by people
Author the threat models and data-protection impact assessments your reviews ask for, with an AI draft as a starting point and a human review to sign off. Each assessment carries its review decision, and AI involvement is disclosed alongside it.
- Assessments that start from a structured draft rather than a blank page
- A signed, reviewable record for every threat model and DPIA
- Clear evidence of AI involvement and human sign-off, ready for any audit
The problem
Security and privacy reviews ask for documented threat models and data-protection impact assessments, but writing them from scratch is slow and inconsistent. Review decisions end up scattered across email threads and documents, so when an auditor asks who approved an assessment and what they decided, you are left reconstructing the answer from records that were never meant to prove anything.
Without IntegraCI
- Assessments started from a blank page each time
- Review decisions scattered across email and shared documents
- No record of who approved what, or when
- AI involvement in drafts undocumented and undisclosed
With IntegraCI
- An AI draft as a consistent starting point for every assessment
- Review decisions captured alongside the assessment itself
- A tamper-evident audit trail of every approval and rejection
- AI involvement disclosed and recorded with each assessment
What you get
AI-drafted
Start from an AI draft instead of a blank page, then refine it.
Reviewed and signed off
An assessment is approved or rejected through a recorded review.
AI disclosed
Where AI helped draft an assessment, that involvement is recorded.
How it works
- 1
Draft the assessment
Start a threat model or DPIA, AI-drafted or from scratch.
- 2
Review and decide
A reviewer approves or rejects, and the decision is recorded.
- 3
Keep the evidence
The signed assessment becomes evidence you can show later.
How it stays governed
The same gates everyone passes, applied here.
Gated by policy
The review requirement is enforced by policy as code. An assessment cannot reach a signed state without a recorded reviewer decision, so the control applies consistently regardless of who authored the draft or whether AI contributed to it.
Recorded, tamper-evident
Every action, from first draft through final review decision, writes once to a tamper-evident audit trail. You can show an auditor the complete record: what was assessed, who reviewed it, what they decided, and whether AI was involved in authoring the draft.
A human in the loop
A reviewer must explicitly approve or reject each assessment before it is signed off. The decision is captured and attributed to the individual who made it, keeping a person in the loop for every assessment that reaches a final state.
Works with your stack
Connect the tools you already run.
Identity connectors scope who can author and review; security and ITSM connectors can surface the assessments that reviews require.
- Aqua Security
- DefectDojo
- Elastic
- Google Cloud
- Greenbone
- HashiCorp
- IBM QRadar
- Isovalent / Cilium
- Mend
- Microsoft Azure
- Open Policy Agent / CNCF
- OpenBao
- OWASP ZAP
- PlexTrac
- ProjectDiscovery
- Prowler
- ScanCode
- Snyk
- +19 more
Who it’s for
Where teams reach for it.
Pre-launch threat modeling for a new service
Before a new service goes to production, your security team needs a threat model on record. Start from an AI draft, refine it for the specific service, and collect a reviewer sign-off that becomes durable audit evidence.
DPIA for a feature that processes personal data
When a product change touches personal data, your privacy team needs a data-protection impact assessment before launch. Author it with an AI draft as a starting point, have a privacy reviewer decide, and keep the signed record ready for regulators.
Building an evidence library ahead of a compliance review
When a compliance audit arrives, you need to show documented, reviewed assessments for your key systems. Each signed assessment, with its reviewer decision and AI-disclosure record, is ready to present without reconstruction.
Questions, answered.
Does IntegraCI replace our existing threat modeling or privacy assessment tools?
No. IntegraCI gives you a place to author, review, and record assessments. If your team already uses a dedicated tool to model threats or document data flows, you can continue using it. IntegraCI captures the review decision and the signed record.
Who can author or review an assessment?
Any user your administrator grants access to. Review decisions are attributed to the individual who made them, and database-enforced row-level security ensures each team sees only the assessments within their scope.
How is the AI draft generated, and can we override it entirely?
The AI produces a structured starting draft based on the assessment type you select (threat model or DPIA). You refine it before submitting for review, or ignore it and write from scratch. Either way, any AI involvement is recorded and disclosed alongside the final assessment.
What happens when a reviewer rejects an assessment?
A rejection is recorded with the same attribution as an approval. The assessment remains in the audit trail, and you can revise and resubmit it for another review cycle. No decision disappears.
Put Risk Assessments on your stack.
Request a demo, or read the docs to see how it fits the tools you already run.